Kubernetes is a large system with many components and many contributors. As with any such software, the feature set naturally evolves over time, and sometimes a feature may need to be removed. This could include an API, a flag, or even an entire feature. To avoid breaking existing users, Kubernetes follows a deprecation policy for aspects of the system that are slated to be removed.
This document details the deprecation policy for various facets of the system.
Since Kubernetes is an API-driven system, the API has evolved over time to reflect the evolving understanding of the problem space. The Kubernetes API is actually a set of APIs, called “API groups”, and each API group is independently versioned. API versions fall into 3 main tracks, each of which has different policies for deprecation:
|v1||GA (generally available, stable)|
A given release of Kubernetes can support any number of API groups and any number of versions of each.
The following rules govern the deprecation of elements of the API. This includes:
These rules are enforced between official releases, not between arbitrary commits to master or release branches.
Rule #1: API elements may only be removed by incrementing the version of the API group.
Once an API element has been added to an API group at a particular version, it can not be removed from that version or have its behavior significantly changed, regardless of track.
Note: For historical reasons, there are 2 “monolithic” API groups - “core” (no group name) and “extensions”. Resources will incrementally be moved from these legacy API groups into more domain-specific API groups.
Rule #2: API objects must be able to round-trip between API versions in a given release without information loss, with the exception of whole REST resources that do not exist in some versions.
For example, an object can be written as v1 and then read back as v2 and converted to v1, and the resulting v1 resource will be identical to the original. The representation in v2 might be different from v1, but the system knows how to convert between them in both directions. Additionally, any new field added in v2 must be able to round-trip to v1 and back, which means v1 might have to add an equivalent field or represent it as an annotation.
Rule #3: An API version in a given track may not be deprecated until a new API version at least as stable is released.
GA API versions can replace GA API versions as well as beta and alpha API versions. Beta API versions may not replace GA API versions.
Rule #4: Other than the most recent API versions in each track, older API versions must be supported after their announced deprecation for a duration of no less than:
This is best illustrated by example. Imagine a Kubernetes release, version X, which supports a particular API group. A new Kubernetes release is made every approximately 3 months (4 per year). The following table describes which API versions are supported in a series of subsequent releases.
|X+4||v1, v2beta1, v2beta2||
|X+5||v1, v2, v2beta2||
Consider a hypothetical REST resource named Widget, which was present in API v1 in the above timeline, and which needs to be deprecated. We document and announce the deprecation in sync with release X+1. The Widget resource still exists in API version v1 (deprecated) but not in v2alpha1. The Widget resource continues to exist and function in releases up to and including X+8. Only in release X+9, when API v1 has aged out, does the Widget resource cease to exist, and the behavior get removed.
As with whole REST resources, an individual field which was present in API v1 must exist and function until API v1 is removed. Unlike whole resources, the v2 APIs may choose a different representation for the field, as long as it can be round-tripped. For example a v1 field named “magnitude” which was deprecated might be named “deprecatedMagnitude” in API v2. When v1 is eventually removed, the deprecated field can be removed from v2.
As with whole REST resources and fields thereof, a constant value which was supported in API v1 must exist and function until API v1 is removed.
Component configs are versioned and managed just like REST resources.
Over time, Kubernetes will introduce more fine-grained API versions, at which point these rules will be adjusted as needed.
The Kubernetes system is comprised of several different programs cooperating. Sometimes, a Kubernetes release might remove flags or CLI commands (collectively “CLI elements”) in these programs. The individual programs naturally sort into two main groups - user-facing and admin-facing programs, which vary slightly in their deprecation policies. Unless a flag is explicitly prefixed or documented as “alpha” or “beta”, it is considered GA.
CLI elements are effectively part of the API to the system, but since they are not versioned in the same way as the REST API, the rules for deprecation are as follows:
Rule #5a: CLI elements of user-facing components (e.g. kubectl) must function after their announced deprecation for no less than:
Rule #5b: CLI elements of admin-facing components (e.g. kubelet) must function after their announced deprecation for no less than:
Rule #6: Deprecated CLI elements must emit warnings (optionally disable) when used.
Occasionally a Kubernetes release needs to deprecate some feature or behavior of the system that is not controlled by the API or CLI. In this case, the rules for deprecation are as follows:
Rule #7: Deprecated behaviors must function for no less than 1 year after their announced deprecation.
This does not imply that all changes to the system are governed by this policy. This applies only to significant, user-visible behaviors which impact the correctness of applications running on Kubernetes or that impact the administration of Kubernetes clusters, and which are being removed entirely.
No policy can cover every possible situation. This policy is a living document, and will evolve over time. In practice, there will be situations that do not fit neatly into this policy, or for which this policy becomes a serious impediment. Such situations should be discussed with SIGs and project leaders to find the best solutions for those specific cases, always bearing in mind that Kubernetes is committed to being a stable system that, as much as possible, never breaks users. Exceptions will always be announced in all relevant release notes.Create an Issue Edit this Page